What Is Essay Generator

Have you ever wished there were some magical way to make essays write themselves? How much easier life would become if only there were something like this! If you have, then your dream has come true – the Internet offers us a number of so-called essay generators which do precisely what it says on the tin – they generate more or less legitimately looking essays based on your requirements. Of course, the humankind is still very far from creating a viable artificial intelligence (and nothing short of it is by definition capable of actually writing a meaningful piece of original text), which means that the quality of these essays leaves much to be desired. In fact, it is pretty hard to say what it the purpose of creating a piece of software like this – they have no practical use, except for a bit of entertainment now and then. No matter how sad it is, the truth is – it is not a very good idea to try submitting an essay created by such generator to your teacher or tutor unless you want to check if he or she actually reads anything before giving marks. Although these programs differ in complexity and quality of results, generally they may only pass for normal, meaningful text only if you don’t read but skim through it. If you pay any attention to the internal logic of the text, the absence of meaning becomes obvious almost immediately. Ironically, it is much more difficult to create a piece of software that would generate a high school-level essay that would make sense than a program to create complex pseudoscientific texts. There is, for example, such thing as SCIgen – a program created by scientists from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology to generate scientifically-looking nonsense. One of its creations, Rooter: A Methodology for the Typical Unification of Access Points and Redundancy even managed to get through to the World Multiconference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics despite making no slightest bit of sense. However, while pseudoscientific gibberish can confuse reader because he is likely to believe that he doesn’t understand anything due to his own limited knowledge, this trick, unfortunately, doesn’t work with high school and college level essays. They are not supposed to use a great deal of complex terminology and professional jargon, and when computer cannot resort to confusion, it becomes very easy to distinguish text written by a real person to nonsense generated by an essay generator. Thus, no matter what is written on the website of the latest essay generator you found, don’t try to pass it for your own work unless you are absolutely sure nobody is going to read it. It seems that students will have to write their own essays for a long, long time after you graduate from college and will be interested in automatically written texts no more – so don’t try to look for anything of this kind now. However, essay generators may be a good source of amusement, especially the better-written ones. They serve as a very good illustration of the kind of writing students use when they can’t boast of a very good grasp of topic: they are rife with clichà ©s, repetitions, vague expressions, meaningless constructions – in other words, anything that sounds confusing and misleading, anything that may be attributed to literally any topic. Sometimes one can read several paragraphs of this gibberish before finally understanding that what he deals with is not just a poorly written essay by a terminally bored student, but a text generated by a piece of program code. It is also a very good approach to evaluation of your own texts. If you feel that your essay may just as well has been written by a machine – you are obviously doing something wrong.

What Is Essay Generator

Have you ever wished there were some magical way to make essays write themselves? How much easier life would become if only there were something like this! If you have, then your dream has come true – the Internet offers us a number of so-called essay generators which do precisely what it says on the tin – they generate more or less legitimately looking essays based on your requirements. Of course, the humankind is still very far from creating a viable artificial intelligence (and nothing short of it is by definition capable of actually writing a meaningful piece of original text), which means that the quality of these essays leaves much to be desired. In fact, it is pretty hard to say what it the purpose of creating a piece of software like this – they have no practical use, except for a bit of entertainment now and then. No matter how sad it is, the truth is – it is not a very good idea to try submitting an essay created by such generator to your teacher or tutor unless you want to check if he or she actually reads anything before giving marks. Although these programs differ in complexity and quality of results, generally they may only pass for normal, meaningful text only if you don’t read but skim through it. If you pay any attention to the internal logic of the text, the absence of meaning becomes obvious almost immediately. Ironically, it is much more difficult to create a piece of software that would generate a high school-level essay that would make sense than a program to create complex pseudoscientific texts. There is, for example, such thing as SCIgen – a program created by scientists from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology to generate scientifically-looking nonsense. One of its creations, Rooter: A Methodology for the Typical Unification of Access Points and Redundancy even managed to get through to the World Multiconference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics despite making no slightest bit of sense. However, while pseudoscientific gibberish can confuse reader because he is likely to believe that he doesn’t understand anything due to his own limited knowledge, this trick, unfortunately, doesn’t work with high school and college level essays. They are not supposed to use a great deal of complex terminology and professional jargon, and when computer cannot resort to confusion, it becomes very easy to distinguish text written by a real person to nonsense generated by an essay generator. Thus, no matter what is written on the website of the latest essay generator you found, don’t try to pass it for your own work unless you are absolutely sure nobody is going to read it. It seems that students will have to write their own essays for a long, long time after you graduate from college and will be interested in automatically written texts no more – so don’t try to look for anything of this kind now. However, essay generators may be a good source of amusement, especially the better-written ones. They serve as a very good illustration of the kind of writing students use when they can’t boast of a very good grasp of topic: they are rife with clichà ©s, repetitions, vague expressions, meaningless constructions – in other words, anything that sounds confusing and misleading, anything that may be attributed to literally any topic. Sometimes one can read several paragraphs of this gibberish before finally understanding that what he deals with is not just a poorly written essay by a terminally bored student, but a text generated by a piece of program code. It is also a very good approach to evaluation of your own texts. If you feel that your essay may just as well has been written by a machine – you are obviously doing something wrong.

What Is Essay Generator

Have you ever wished there were some magical way to make essays write themselves? How much easier life would become if only there were something like this! If you have, then your dream has come true – the Internet offers us a number of so-called essay generators which do precisely what it says on the tin – they generate more or less legitimately looking essays based on your requirements. Of course, the humankind is still very far from creating a viable artificial intelligence (and nothing short of it is by definition capable of actually writing a meaningful piece of original text), which means that the quality of these essays leaves much to be desired. In fact, it is pretty hard to say what it the purpose of creating a piece of software like this – they have no practical use, except for a bit of entertainment now and then. No matter how sad it is, the truth is – it is not a very good idea to try submitting an essay created by such generator to your teacher or tutor unless you want to check if he or she actually reads anything before giving marks. Although these programs differ in complexity and quality of results, generally they may only pass for normal, meaningful text only if you don’t read but skim through it. If you pay any attention to the internal logic of the text, the absence of meaning becomes obvious almost immediately. Ironically, it is much more difficult to create a piece of software that would generate a high school-level essay that would make sense than a program to create complex pseudoscientific texts. There is, for example, such thing as SCIgen – a program created by scientists from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology to generate scientifically-looking nonsense. One of its creations, Rooter: A Methodology for the Typical Unification of Access Points and Redundancy even managed to get through to the World Multiconference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics despite making no slightest bit of sense. However, while pseudoscientific gibberish can confuse reader because he is likely to believe that he doesn’t understand anything due to his own limited knowledge, this trick, unfortunately, doesn’t work with high school and college level essays. They are not supposed to use a great deal of complex terminology and professional jargon, and when computer cannot resort to confusion, it becomes very easy to distinguish text written by a real person to nonsense generated by an essay generator. Thus, no matter what is written on the website of the latest essay generator you found, don’t try to pass it for your own work unless you are absolutely sure nobody is going to read it. It seems that students will have to write their own essays for a long, long time after you graduate from college and will be interested in automatically written texts no more – so don’t try to look for anything of this kind now. However, essay generators may be a good source of amusement, especially the better-written ones. They serve as a very good illustration of the kind of writing students use when they can’t boast of a very good grasp of topic: they are rife with clichà ©s, repetitions, vague expressions, meaningless constructions – in other words, anything that sounds confusing and misleading, anything that may be attributed to literally any topic. Sometimes one can read several paragraphs of this gibberish before finally understanding that what he deals with is not just a poorly written essay by a terminally bored student, but a text generated by a piece of program code. It is also a very good approach to evaluation of your own texts. If you feel that your essay may just as well has been written by a machine – you are obviously doing something wrong.

What Is Essay Generator

Have you ever wished there were some magical way to make essays write themselves? How much easier life would become if only there were something like this! If you have, then your dream has come true – the Internet offers us a number of so-called essay generators which do precisely what it says on the tin – they generate more or less legitimately looking essays based on your requirements. Of course, the humankind is still very far from creating a viable artificial intelligence (and nothing short of it is by definition capable of actually writing a meaningful piece of original text), which means that the quality of these essays leaves much to be desired. In fact, it is pretty hard to say what it the purpose of creating a piece of software like this – they have no practical use, except for a bit of entertainment now and then. No matter how sad it is, the truth is – it is not a very good idea to try submitting an essay created by such generator to your teacher or tutor unless you want to check if he or she actually reads anything before giving marks. Although these programs differ in complexity and quality of results, generally they may only pass for normal, meaningful text only if you don’t read but skim through it. If you pay any attention to the internal logic of the text, the absence of meaning becomes obvious almost immediately. Ironically, it is much more difficult to create a piece of software that would generate a high school-level essay that would make sense than a program to create complex pseudoscientific texts. There is, for example, such thing as SCIgen – a program created by scientists from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology to generate scientifically-looking nonsense. One of its creations, Rooter: A Methodology for the Typical Unification of Access Points and Redundancy even managed to get through to the World Multiconference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics despite making no slightest bit of sense. However, while pseudoscientific gibberish can confuse reader because he is likely to believe that he doesn’t understand anything due to his own limited knowledge, this trick, unfortunately, doesn’t work with high school and college level essays. They are not supposed to use a great deal of complex terminology and professional jargon, and when computer cannot resort to confusion, it becomes very easy to distinguish text written by a real person to nonsense generated by an essay generator. Thus, no matter what is written on the website of the latest essay generator you found, don’t try to pass it for your own work unless you are absolutely sure nobody is going to read it. It seems that students will have to write their own essays for a long, long time after you graduate from college and will be interested in automatically written texts no more – so don’t try to look for anything of this kind now. However, essay generators may be a good source of amusement, especially the better-written ones. They serve as a very good illustration of the kind of writing students use when they can’t boast of a very good grasp of topic: they are rife with clichà ©s, repetitions, vague expressions, meaningless constructions – in other words, anything that sounds confusing and misleading, anything that may be attributed to literally any topic. Sometimes one can read several paragraphs of this gibberish before finally understanding that what he deals with is not just a poorly written essay by a terminally bored student, but a text generated by a piece of program code. It is also a very good approach to evaluation of your own texts. If you feel that your essay may just as well has been written by a machine – you are obviously doing something wrong.

What Is Essay Generator

Have you ever wished there were some magical way to make essays write themselves? How much easier life would become if only there were something like this! If you have, then your dream has come true – the Internet offers us a number of so-called essay generators which do precisely what it says on the tin – they generate more or less legitimately looking essays based on your requirements. Of course, the humankind is still very far from creating a viable artificial intelligence (and nothing short of it is by definition capable of actually writing a meaningful piece of original text), which means that the quality of these essays leaves much to be desired. In fact, it is pretty hard to say what it the purpose of creating a piece of software like this – they have no practical use, except for a bit of entertainment now and then. No matter how sad it is, the truth is – it is not a very good idea to try submitting an essay created by such generator to your teacher or tutor unless you want to check if he or she actually reads anything before giving marks. Although these programs differ in complexity and quality of results, generally they may only pass for normal, meaningful text only if you don’t read but skim through it. If you pay any attention to the internal logic of the text, the absence of meaning becomes obvious almost immediately. Ironically, it is much more difficult to create a piece of software that would generate a high school-level essay that would make sense than a program to create complex pseudoscientific texts. There is, for example, such thing as SCIgen – a program created by scientists from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology to generate scientifically-looking nonsense. One of its creations, Rooter: A Methodology for the Typical Unification of Access Points and Redundancy even managed to get through to the World Multiconference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics despite making no slightest bit of sense. However, while pseudoscientific gibberish can confuse reader because he is likely to believe that he doesn’t understand anything due to his own limited knowledge, this trick, unfortunately, doesn’t work with high school and college level essays. They are not supposed to use a great deal of complex terminology and professional jargon, and when computer cannot resort to confusion, it becomes very easy to distinguish text written by a real person to nonsense generated by an essay generator. Thus, no matter what is written on the website of the latest essay generator you found, don’t try to pass it for your own work unless you are absolutely sure nobody is going to read it. It seems that students will have to write their own essays for a long, long time after you graduate from college and will be interested in automatically written texts no more – so don’t try to look for anything of this kind now. However, essay generators may be a good source of amusement, especially the better-written ones. They serve as a very good illustration of the kind of writing students use when they can’t boast of a very good grasp of topic: they are rife with clichà ©s, repetitions, vague expressions, meaningless constructions – in other words, anything that sounds confusing and misleading, anything that may be attributed to literally any topic. Sometimes one can read several paragraphs of this gibberish before finally understanding that what he deals with is not just a poorly written essay by a terminally bored student, but a text generated by a piece of program code. It is also a very good approach to evaluation of your own texts. If you feel that your essay may just as well has been written by a machine – you are obviously doing something wrong.

The Spiritual Autobiography And Theater Classes - 1554 Words

Spiritual Autobiography I grew up in a somewhat Christian home. God was mentioned and I knew about God from a young age due to the Mother’s day out program I attended at a local church. We typically attended church once or twice a year, never on Christmas or Easter, for fear of being â€Å"those people† that only came for holidays. Growing up, I lived with my mother, who is chronically disabled with Multiple Sclerosis, and my grandmother. My parents separated when I was two but I still saw my dad regularly. I was also very close with my aunt, a flight attendant with no kids whose favorite saying was, â€Å"No moms, no rules†. I grew up as an only child and the youngest in my family, circumstances that easily made me the center of attention. I took dance lessons and theater classes, I began preschool at the most prestigious private elementary school in town. Before beginning school I recall not knowing anyone that did not love me, however I had little thought that God loved me most of all. I began preschool at a private school, something I relished greatly. I was described as socially and academically ahead and loved the school atmosphere with its challenges and opportunities for success. I stayed at that school through kindergarten and enjoyed it thoroughly. My kindergarten teacher predicted that I would be an actress, or perhaps an attorney. During these early years in my life I feel that my ego was greatly inflated. My life was full of accolades and devoid of criticism, somethingShow MoreRelatedEssay The Life and Work of William Butler Yeats2147 Words   |  9 PagesRevival, many of whom were to remain lifelong friends (Magill, 1957). Yeats soon discovered that his first love was poetry not painting. Soon began Yeatss love affair with Ireland and Irish literature that would last the rest of his life. Yeatss spiritual outlook would play a significant role in his life and his works. Born into a Protestant family, with a paternal grandfather and great-grandfather having been Anglican clergymen, religion was a constant presence in Yeatss childhood. Yeats began toRead MoreLangston Hughes Research Paper25309 Words   |  102 Pagesmortgage seemed almost as bad as the words slavery or Jim Crow Laws, the rules of segregation that kept him and other blacks from using public restrooms or drinking from public fountains, entering certain stores, associating with whites in restaurants, theaters, and trains. If blacks were permitted to enter a facility, they had to use a separate entrance and sit in a separate section. Langston became an avid reader. His favorite magazine was Crisis, published by W.E.B. Du Bois, whose essays urged AfricanRead MoreFrom Salvation to Self-Realization18515 Words   |  75 Pagesserious consideration. Even if ordinary people do not consciously embrace the conventional wisdom, it shapes their tacit assumptions in subtle ways. One thinks, for example, of Theodore Roosevelts remark to a political foe that we do not have classes at all on this side of the water a conventionally wise belief that has shaped American opinion throughout the twentieth century. By helping to create a taken-for-granted reality, the leaders of the dominant culture identify beliefs that are inRead MoreNew World Order in Conspiracy Theory13987 Words   |  56 Pagescollectivist system run by the United Nations.[13] American televangelist  Pat Robertson  with his 1991 best-selling book  The New World Order  became the most prominent Christian popularizer of conspiracy theories about recent American history as a theater in which  Wall Street, the Federal Reserve System, Council on Foreign Relations,  Bilderberg Group, and  Trilateral Commission  control the flow of events from behind the scenes, nudging us constantly and covertly in the direction of world governmentRead MoreHow to Write a Research Paper11497 Words   |  46 Pagesanalyses of Bradstreet s works by other critics, historical information about the conventions of poetry during Puritan times, Bradstreet biographies, etc. Primary Sources are original words of a writer (novel, speech, eyewitness account, letter, autobiography, interview). Secondary Sources are works about somebody and about his/her work. These include books and articles about a novel, speech, document, or scientific finding. There are many places to find secondary sources including the card-catalogRead Morewisdom,humor and faith19596 Words   |  79 PagesFolly as a goddess addressing her devotees. She begins with the presumption that folly is shared by all humans. Through her, Erasmus ticks off follies found among all classes—like those of lovers, spouses, money-seekers, nationalists, warmongers, and the old trying to look young—but he targets mainly the folly of the upper classes like kings, courtiers, popes, and bishops, and the most pretentious and would-be wise like writers, lawyers, scientists, philosophers, and theologians. He describes writersRead MoreMultiple Intelligences Seminar and Workshop14464 Words   |  58 Pagesthe tunes for the sequel to The Miseducation of Lauryn Hill. # Julian has painted brilliant fall leaves on each windowpane. # Mia cant wait to get to PE. # Colin has organized the schools charity fund drive. # Deepak provides in-class spiritual counseling. # Jane adds a new animal to the class menagerie daily. # Gary scrawls witty absurdities in the margins of his notebook. The next time you have a chance to reflect on your class, imagine your students as individuals who have fullyRead MoreOne Significant Change That Has Occurred in the World Between 1900 and 2005. Explain the Impact This Change Has Made on Our Lives and Why It Is an Important Change.163893 Words   |  656 PagesAmerica Joanne Meyerowitz, ed., History and September 11th John McMillian and Paul Buhle, eds., The New Left Revisited David M. Scobey, Empire City: The Making and Meaning of the New York City Landscape Gerda Lerner, Fireweed: A Political Autobiography Allida M. Black, ed., Modern American Queer History Eric Sandweiss, St. Louis: The Evolution of an American Urban Landscape Sam Wineburg, Historical Thinking and Other Unnatural Acts: Charting the Future of Teaching the Past Sharon HartmanRead MoreInnovators Dna84615 Words   |  339 Pagesfull list of innovators we interviewed whom we quote in this book, see appendix A; virtually all of the innovators we quote, with the exception of Steve Jobs (Apple), Richard Branson (Virgin), and Howard Schultz (Starbucks)—who have written autobiographies or have given numerous interviews about innovation—are from our interviews. We also studied CEOs who ignited innovation in existing companies, such as Procter Gamble’s A. G. Lafley, eBay’s Meg Whitman, and Bain Company’s Orit GadieshRead MoreStrategy Safari by Mintzberg71628 Words   |  287 PagesVietnam that the failures of such an approach became all too apparent. Likewise in consulting, the design school model has often proved to be an all too convenient tool. Outsiders could descend on a corporation, much as did students in their case study classes, and do a S W O T analysis—in more ways than one. To quote from a popular book by two consultants: Four or five working days over a two-month period are required to set strategy. Two or three working days are required for the review and one-year

Alcohol Use Disorder Free Essays

Alcohol use disorders are among the most prevalent mental disorders worldwide and rank high as a cause of disability burden in most regions of the world. (Grant et al. , 2006)The following paper discusses the recent research findings and essential features based on the content of diagnosis, assessment and treatment. We will write a custom essay sample on Alcohol Use Disorder or any similar topic only for you Order Now Diagnosis The DSM-IV-TR classifies drug disorders into substance use disorders (substance dependence and abuse) and substance-induced disorders (substance intoxication, substance withdrawal, induced delirium, anxiety, depression, psychosis and mood disorders). Sometimes it is difficult assessing patient’s psychiatric complaints because heavy drinking is associated with alcoholism can co-exist with, contribute to or result from several different psychiatric syndromes. (Shivani, Goldsmith Anthenelli, 2002) In order to improve diagnostic accuracy, distinguishes among alcohol-related psychiatric symptoms and signs, alcohol-induced psychiatric syndromes and independent psychiatric disorders that are commonly associated with alcoholism emerges to be essential. Patients’ gender, family history, and course of illness over time also should be taken into account. Alcohol-related psychiatric symptoms and signs Heavy alcohol consumption directly affects brain function and brain chemical and hormonal systems known to be involved in many common mental disorders thus can manifest itself in a broad range of psychiatric symptoms and signs. (Koob, 2000) And this usually the first problem which brings the patients seek help. The symptoms vary depending on the amount of alcohol used, how long it is used and how recently it was used as well as patient’s vulnerability to experiencing psychiatric symptoms in the setting of consumption. For example, during intoxication, smaller amount alcohol may produce euphoria whereas larger amount may produce more dramatic changes in mood. Alcohol also impairs judgment and aggressive, antisocial behaviours that may mimic certain externalizing disorders such as ASPD. Alcohol-induced psychiatric syndromes The essential feature of alcohol-induced psychiatric syndromes is the presence of prominent and persistent symptoms, which are judged- based on their onset and course as well as on the patient’s history, physical exam, and laboratory findings to be the result of the direct physiological effects of alcohol. Given the broad range of effects of heavy drinking may have on psychological functioning, these alcohol-induced disorders span several categories of mental disorders, including mood, anxiety, psychotic, sleep, sexual, delirious, amnestic and dementia disorders. Alcoholism with comorbid, independent psychiatric disorders Alcoholism is also associated with several psychiatric disorders that develop independently of the alcoholism and may precede alcohol use and abuse. One of the most common of these comorbid conditions is ASPD, and axis II personality disorder marked by a longstanding pattern of irresponsibility and violating the rights of others with alcohol. (Stinson et al. , 2006) Assessment The three major purposes for a comprehensive assessment are to determine a diagnosis, devise a treatment plan and to make appropriate referrals. The assessment should provide a clinical picture of the client’s personal level of functioning, history, presenting problems, family and social context in the client’s life. It is very important that the assessment process requires the gathering of comprehensive, accurate information, for a valid diagnosis and appropriate treatment. – It is vital that the counsellor needs to collect valid and reliable information. Both formal diagnosis, as listed in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (APA, 1994) and informal diagnosis, if the client has had therapy in the past can be made. – Comprehensive assessment is essential in designing a treatment plan. The more information provided concerning the etiology, functioning level and prognosis of the problem, the better the treatment plan. – Comprehensive assessment also provides information in order to made appropriate referral. The counsellor may decide to provide treatment solely or in conjunction with some other drug treatment specialists. Generally there are three categories of assessment measures: subjective data and physiological data. -Subjective data To collect information of demographics, family and living situations, mployment, education, drinking history (including development of the drinking problem and current drinking) and the effects on the subject’s cognitive, psychosocial, behavioural and physiological functioning. (Aalto Seppa, 2005) For example, some questionnaires focus on problems caused by alcohol consumption, the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT) (Saunders, Aasland, Babor, de le Fuente, Grant, 1993) There are ones with diaries focussing on the quantification of alcohol consumption, such as quantity-frequency, time-period or time-line follow-back methods. Webb et al. , 1990) More recently, a low level of response (LR) to alcohol (the need for higher amounts to have an effect) is a genetically influenced characteristic that is both found in populations at high risk for future alcoholism and that predicts alcohol related life problems in future. This Self-Rating of the Effects of Alcohol (SRE) questionnaire asks for estimate of number of drinks required to produce each of four effects at different times in their lives. Miller, Thomas, Mallin, 2006) In addition, the survey included the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-C (AUDIT-C), a three-question alcohol screening test adapted from the original AUDIT developed by the World Health Organization for use in primary health care. The AUDIT-C is a simple, reliable screening tool that focuses on the frequency of drinking, quantify consumed on the typical occasion and the frequency of heavy episode drinking. (Bush, Kivlahan, McDonnell, al. , 1998) Again, there is no such perfect measure that SRE was found to be biased and not able to identify high functioning middle-age women. Schuckit, Smith, Danko, Isacescu, 2003) The difficulty with these specific questionnaires is that people who drink alcohol in general tend to neglect or underestimate their alcohol consumption. (Koch et al. , 2004) The accuracy of these measures is based on the patient’s awareness of and willingness to acknowledge his or her pattern and level of alcohol use as well as negative effects of drinking. At least some individuals who drink excessively will fail to do this. (Allen Litten, 2001) – Physiological data Comparing to subjective data, physiological data can overcome the subjectivity, underestimation in particular thus provides more precise and objective information about the drinking issue. It includes general medical and psychiatric history and examination. This is conducted through screening of blood, breath or urine for alcohol used, further on laboratory tests for abnormalities that may be accompanied acute or chronic alcohol use such as gamma-glutamy-transferase (GGT) or mean corpuscular volume (MCV), a measure of the average size of red blood cells. These may also be used during treatment for potential relapse. GGT is the most commonly used biochemical measure of drinking. However, it is not clear how much drinking is actually needed to cause GGT levels to elevate. And MCV tends to miss more alcoholics than GGT as MCV may be elevated by a variety of conditions other than heavy drinking such as non-alcoholic liver disease, smoking, advanced age or use of anticonvulsants etc. Thus applying the usual cut-off points for these tests, GGT turns out to have a low specificity whereas MCV shows a low sensitivity. This may lead to a gross misunderstanding with the patient and unnecessary further testing. Carbohydrate deficient transferring (CDT) has been recently approved as a marker for identification of individuals with alcohol problems as well as an aid in recognizing if alcoholic patients in treatment have relapsed. CDT and GGT appear to validly detect somewhat different groups of people with alcohol problems. GGT may best pick up those with liver damage due to drinking, whereas CDT seems to be related to level of consumption with or without liver damage. It should be kept in mind that biomarkers do not identify women or adolescents with alcohol problems as they do for male or adults in general. (Similarly, self-report screening tests are also generally less able to detect alcohol problems) (Allen Litten, 2001) Previous studies showed that over 80% of internists and family clinicians report that they usually or always ask new outpatients whether they drink alcohol. Less than 20% of primary care physicians routinely use validated self-report alcohol screening instruments (e. g. CAGE questions or AUDIT) Fewer than half ask about maximum alcohol consumption on one occasion. Alcohol biomarker laboratory tests are rarely used. Reasons given by clinicians for not following recommended alcohol screening guidelines range from lack of time, to insufficient knowledge and skills, to pessimistic attitudes about the ultimate benefits of screening. A current study conducted by Miller, et al. , (2004), they found that approximately 60% of clinicians surveyed frequently screen patients for alcohol use with quantity/frequency and CAGE questions. This is comparable to the incidence of screening found in previous studies. (Miller, Ornstein, Nietert, Anton, 2004)Miller, et al. 2006) further found that over 90% of patients were in favour of screening and guidance about alcohol use and very positive about the use of biological alcohol markers. These findings suggest that physicians and clinicians may be convinced that patients are open to alcohol screening and would not be offended by it. Heavy drinkers may have more of a tendency to be embarrassed by such questions but there is no evidence they would be object to screening. The majority of patients would also be willing to receive alcohol biomarker blood tests, if their physicians and clinicians deemed such tests necessary. How to cite Alcohol Use Disorder, Essay examples